Orsino and I have both been teaching AP English Language this year, but our collaboration and checking-in have been somewhat haphazard. This is partly, I think, because this course is right in his area of expertise (American lit/rhetoric and composition), and he augmented his expertise this summer by attending an AP Institute, which I still haven’t done. So while I do share materials I already have, or things I create, as we go along, I have been doing it in an offhand, desultory way: “Here are some quizzes, use anything you want.” He doesn’t tend to make “materials” in the way that I’ve learned to do since beginning to teach HS; he plans discussions and activities, but not usually around a handout or a reading quiz. I think he realized he needed to get some smaller grades in the gradebook, though, so he seems to have been doing more of it lately.
Today we met to do a bit of norming for the exam essay (a practice AP), and several factors were in play:
- His main source of information about how the essays are scored is the Institute he attended, while mine is reading the score analyses of sample essays on the AP website.
- Perhaps because of this, he values hewing strongly to certain formal elements of the exam essay because one of his big takeaways from the Institute was that the grading is extremely formulaic; I am more swayed by a student whose writing and thinking are deft, even unconventional, if they make good points and demonstrate that they really get the text, say, for the rhetorical analysis essay. (This is not to say that he doesn’t appreciate the latter kind of student, or that I don’t understand that the students need to meet the requirements of the prompt; it’s just that we’re reacting to different things as graders.)
- We are more different as readers and teachers than I realized. He is so smart about historical and cultural context; he’s a big-picture person; he’s interested in helping students grasp the whole phenomenon of American literature. I am a close reader; I want the students to immerse; I’m a bit skeptical of periodization and literary “movements” (increasingly, I think, as I get older).
- I have known for a while that it makes me a little anxious to talk with him, but I thought it was just that he is really smart and I am–well, I’m smart enough, and intellectual enough, but I know the real thing when I see it and he, like Dr. Tea, is the real thing. Today I realized that it also makes him a little anxious to talk with me, and–piecing together comments he’s made in the past–I think it’s because he isn’t a writer, and he can see that I pick up on different things than he does; also, as he said today, close reading is not as natural to him as it is to me. I said to him a while back that my class had spent the whole period on the first paragraph of The Great Gatsby, and looking back on our conversation, I think now that he truly could not imagine how–or, probably, why–we would do that.
I actually felt quite agitated at the end of our norming session, because we seemed so far apart and I doubted myself–but I thought about it on the way home (the meeting ran longer than we’d planned; I’d had to leave abruptly to meet the Snork Maiden, and we’d agreed to meet again in the morning) and I realized that we had finally figured out what we’d skirted all semester–that we are just two different models of English teacher, and that we do respect each other but were probably both a little freaked out at the realization of our difference.
This is where being chair mostly complicates things, because as chair, I have no qualms about Orsino at all. He was a superb hire and he’s an excellent teacher. I think I might actually need to say this to him very directly. Of course I’ve said it before, but since we are experiencing our differences, it is worth saying again. I want to be sure he understands how much I welcome his approach. (Also, I know he has had some family trouble this year, and he’s had some days when he’s looked pretty down. Just throwing that in there as I think about the ways in which we haven’t connected as well as we might have in first semester.)
Anyway, after I’d thought about it some more, I called him (he was still at school; I took the Snork Maiden home after her morning exam) and said that I’d found the discussion initially disorienting, but ultimately helpful, and that I understood our different tendencies better now, and wanted to learn more from his approach. He said, “I feel exactly the same,” in a way that made me think we had probably been thinking along the same lines.
It’s weird to be on such different pages, so to speak, with someone I respect so much. And it’s kind of annoying that we didn’t manage before this to get even to this place of partial understanding.
How much of a difference will it make to the students? Oh, probably not very much. Lucinda, with whom I’ve taught the course in the past, and I are pretty different, too. Lucinda’s and my differences don’t bother me much, maybe because I see her as such a consummate high school teacher, even though she has English degrees from a top SLAC and a top M.A. program. With Orsino–and also with Viola, who isn’t with us this year–it’s probably partly their experience in college comp./rhet. and lit. that makes me doubt my own instincts. So actually it touches an insecurity in me–aha. Yes, that sounds right.
It’s more that the students make a difference to us, really. They give us a common ground, because we both have strong students and weak students, students who are responding vigorously to our coaching and students who aren’t, students who probably could have earned 5s in September and students who might earn a 3 on a good day. The point is to help them all as much as possible. And that’s a motivation to share more of our knowledge and techniques.
Also, our sections’ averages on the multiple choice section were exactly the same: 71%. (That’s a pretty good multiple-choice score, in case you don’t have the context. With three strong essays, you can still get a score of 5. Look up AP scoring calculators if you’re interested.)
Unfortunately, we have no free periods in common this year (in part because half my load, and sixty percent of his, is the same course), so we will really have to work to make the time.